Public Opinion: Iceland teen known legally as ‘girl’ fights for right to name

REYKJAVIK, Iceland –  Call her the girl with no name.

A 15-year-old is suing the Icelandic state for the right to legally use the name given to her by her mother. The problem? Blaer, which means “light breeze” in Icelandic, is not on a list approved by the government.

Like a handful of other countries, including Germany and Denmark, Iceland has official rules about what a baby can be named. In a country comfortable with a firm state role, most people don’t question the Personal Names Register, a list of 1,712 male names and 1,853 female names that fit Icelandic grammar and pronunciation rules and that officials maintain will protect children from embarrassment. Parents can take from the list or apply to a special committee that has the power to say yea or nay.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/world/2013/01/03/iceland-teen-known-legally-as-girl-fights-for-right-to-name/#ixzz2GvT0HEOU

What do you think of this naming, um … tradition (?) that Iceland has?

About That's My Answer

Official question asker.
Bookmark the permalink.

5 Responses to Public Opinion: Iceland teen known legally as ‘girl’ fights for right to name

  1. Maryz says:

    I didn’t know about this particularly, but I do know that Iceland does think of names different from what we’re used to. They have very few surnames, and seldom use them. We asked our guide her last name, and she was surprised to be asked. Nobody’s very concerned about it. Also, surnames vary according to gender. The daughter (Mary) of a man named Sam would be Mary Samsdottir. Sam’s son would be Joe Samsen.

  2. l'empress says:

    From a wider viewpoint, it’s probably a good idea, protecting children from some very stupid and embarrassing names. (Consider the 19th century mogul “Big Jim” Hogg, who named his daughter Ima.)

    From a personal viewpoint, I don’t see anything wrong with the name “light breeze.” Have you never heard of a girl named Zephyr?

  3. Lindy says:

    While I agree that it would help protect the child from being named something inappropriate or embarrassing, I do not agree that an unrelated person or authority should be allowed to dictate what parents may name their children.

  4. Bev says:

    how different our country would be with that rule. No “Apple” or “Hashtag” or most of the names of hippie babies in the 60s. i think you can do that in a small sized country but not possible in a country as big and ethnically diverse as this one.

  5. Jennifer says:

    I am all for it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

Notify me of followup comments via e-mail. You can also subscribe without commenting.